Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer (1891–1947)

read more:

Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer Biography

Socialist and communist resistance in Hall in Tyrol

Ing. Anton Hradetzky resistance in Innsbruck

Explore the life of Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer – Innsbruck lawyer, Nazi resistance figure, Gestapo prisoner, and Vice Mayor in 1945. A powerful story of courage and post-war rebuilding in Tyrol.

Photograph Friedl (Gottfried, born 1922)  and Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer (1929/30 ?). In private archive Gayane Chambless USA.

Chapter: "I Have Had Enough" – Resignation on Principle

Among the surviving documents relating to the biography of Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer, there is one of extraordinary insight. It is not an official identification card, not a death certificate, and not a newspaper article, but a personal, political manifesto – a letter he addressed to the party executive of the Socialist Party of Austria (SPÖ) on January 26, 1946.
This document, addressed to Secretary Rupert Zechtl at Maximilianstraße in Innsbruck, marks the dramatic climax of an internal party conflict that overshadowed Uffenheimer's brief political career in the post-war period. It is the writing of a deeply disappointed man who feels betrayed by his own party – yet it is also the testimony of a man who remains true to his principles, even at the cost of his office.

The Occasion for the Letter

Uffenheimer begins factually, almost officially. A telephone call from Secretary Zechtl informed him that the executive, at its meeting the previous day, had decided to hold him accountable for "violating party discipline." Initially, he was to appear in person; then he was instructed to submit a written statement. Uffenheimer notes with dismay that he would now have to answer before a body of his own party "for the second time." The reasons for this, as he indirectly cites the accusations, were allegedly misrepresented or taken-out-of-context statements made on official occasions.
Between the lines, one can already sense deep bitterness: he, who had been appointed mayor based on the trust of his comrades, now had to justify himself before an arbitration committee – because of machinations and slander.

The Loss of Trust

The tone of the letter changes abruptly when Uffenheimer draws the consequence of this summons. He declares that he apparently no longer enjoys the party's confidence. His conclusion is radical but logical:
"I have therefore decided to return the position entrusted to me to the party […]"
He resigns – not only before the party but has also notified "the currently appointed government" of his step. The break is complete. An office that had been entrusted to him by the provisional government in early May 1945, he now returns of his own free will.

The Explosive Justification: Fighting Against Former Nazis

But Uffenheimer does not stop at a mere declaration of resignation. He uses the opportunity to hold a mirror up to the party executive – and his words are remarkably sharp. He states that he had fought from the very beginning for the "purity of the party." Above all, he had refused to associate or cooperate in leadership positions "with people who once belonged to the NSDAP."
The accusation that speaks from these lines is devastating: The party executive had to this day failed "to eliminate the former members of the NSDAP within its ranks." Uffenheimer declares categorically that he will neither answer nor justify himself before such members. The wording is deliberately provocative:
"It would be paradoxical if members of the NSDAP and supporters of the National Socialist idea were to summon me before a forum in which they themselves sit as members."
In these few sentences lies the true scandal that the letter reveals. The SPÖ, which understood itself as an anti-fascist party, apparently had former Nazis in its leadership bodies – and these people were to pass judgment on the discipline of a man who had been in the resistance and had narrowly escaped with his life.

The Personal Outburst of Anger

The final passage of the letter drops the mask of official reserve. It is no longer a functionary speaking, but a wounded, deeply bitter human being. Uffenheimer has finally had "enough" of being "used as a punching bag for people who themselves turned their backs on the party." He, who had remained loyal to the party during the years of "life or death" – that is, during the time of illegality and resistance – was now being put on trial by those who had themselves failed.
His final sentence on the situation of the Tyrolean SPÖ is damning:
"Otherwise, the S.P.Oe. and its executive will have to answer for it themselves here if the party in the state of Tyrol becomes a breeding ground for careerists, greedy people, and moral scoundrels."
A "breeding ground" for careerists, the greedy, and the morally corrupt. This is no longer an accusation but an indictment.

Drawing the Line

Uffenheimer announces that he will take his "duly earned leave" starting Monday, January 28, 1946. He will vacate his law office and hand over his property. The letter ends formally with "With respect" – but this politeness seems almost mocking in light of the anger that speaks from the preceding lines.

Historical Context

This document is remarkable for several reasons. First, it shows that the political denazification process after 1945 was by no means as thorough as official historiography long claimed. Uffenheimer's accusation that former NSDAP members sat on the governing bodies of the Socialist Party is an early, courageous, and documented indication of the extent of personal continuities across the year 1945.
Second, the letter reveals a profound existential crisis in the early phase of the Second Republic: The moral claim of the resistance, which Uffenheimer personally embodied, collided with the pragmatic, party-tactical reality of reconstruction. Uffenheimer, the uncompromising character, was no longer at home in this world.
Third, the letter is a deeply human document. It shows a man who refuses to bend, who would rather give up his office than cooperate with people he considers morally corrupt. It is the same principle that guided him in the resistance: uncompromising action according to his own conscience.

Afterword

Whether the Tyrolean SPÖ ever responded to this letter is not known from the available documents. What is known, however, is that Uffenheimer carried through with his resignation and gave up the office of vice-mayor. Just over a year and a half later, on October 2, 1947, he died in Innsbruck at the age of 55.
Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer's final resting place is the Westfriedhof in Innsbruck (Group 10, Row 1, Grave No. 2). There he found peace – far from the "careerists, greedy people, and moral scoundrels" against whom he had fought until the very end.

Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.

Source: Letter to the Tyrolean SPÖ . In private archives Gayane Chambless USA.

Translation: January 26, 1946

To the Party Executive of the S.P.Oe.
Attention of the Secretary, Mr. Rupert Zechtl
Innsbruck, Maximilianstraße
I was informed today by telephone by Secretary Rupert Zechtl of the resolution passed at the executive meeting held on January 25, 1946, according to which I was first to answer orally before the party executive at the next scheduled date for violating party discipline. This resolution was amended to the effect that I am to respond in writing. I note that I would now have to answer for the second time before an arbitration committee or before the party executive, and this solely because, as a result of machinations and misrepresentations of various statements made on official occasions, the party members concerned either passed on distorted facts or used true facts as a pretext to hold me accountable.
I was appointed Mayor of Innsbruck in early May 1945 by the provisional government of Austria, based on the trust of the social-democratic members, and was then again designated as faction leader and lead candidate for the municipal council through the election of the trusted representatives of the S.P.Oe. Given these facts, which have given rise to summoning me repeatedly before an arbitration committee to be appointed or before the party executive, I assume that I no longer enjoy the party's confidence. I have therefore decided to return the position entrusted to me to the party and have also notified the currently appointed government of this decision.
On this occasion, I inform the executive of the S.P.Oe. of the following: From the very beginning of my work after the final liberation from Nazi oppression, I have fought for the purity of the party, particularly of the executive, and I have refused to associate or cooperate in leadership positions with people who once belonged to the NSDAP. The party executive has to this day failed to eliminate the former members of the NSDAP within its ranks, and I do not hesitate to declare after such a finding that I will not answer or justify myself before such members of the party executive. It would be paradoxical if members of the NSDAP and supporters of the National Socialist idea were to summon me before a forum in which they themselves sit as members. I am now fed up with allowing myself, who remained loyal to the party at a time when it was a matter of life and death, to be used as a punching bag by people who themselves turned their backs on the party.
Otherwise, the S.P.Oe. and its executive will have to answer for it themselves here if the party in the state of Tyrol becomes a breeding ground for careerists, greedy people, and moral scoundrels.
Please take note of this decision of mine. I will begin my duly earned leave starting Monday, January 28, 1946, after which I will hand over the agendas I have been handling to a designated successor, should it prove appropriate and necessary. I will vacate my law office and my property on Monday the 28th of this month.
With respect,
(signature)

Conflicts in the Aftermath: Politics after 1945

🕰️ Historical Background: Denazification and Political Reality

The conflict must be understood within the context of the immediate post-war period. After 1945, all political parties in Austria faced the dual challenge of rebuilding the state while simultaneously confronting the legacy of National Socialism.
The process of denazification was initially pursued rigorously but soon lost momentum. As early as 1946/47, a gradual reintegration of former members of the Nazi Party into society and political life began.
👉 This development affected all major political parties:

• Within the Social Democratic Party of Austria (SPÖ), internal tensions arose regarding how to deal with former NSDAP members.
• The Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) also adopted a pragmatic approach and integrated former National Socialists at an early stage, particularly at the local level.

This shift was driven in part by political pragmatism—many qualified professionals had a National Socialist past—but it also led to significant internal conflicts, as illustrated by the case of Dr. Gottfried Uffenheimer.

📌 Significance of the Document

This letter is a compelling historical testimony to:

• the political tensions of the early Second Austrian Republic
• the conflicts surrounding denazification
• the moral and personal divisions within political parties

It portrays Dr. Uffenheimer as a figure of strong political principles who opposed the rapid reintegration of former National Socialists—ultimately at the cost of his own political position.